爷不想上班
The exchange shows a headline ROI of -100% (rank #8,907), but our analysis found 2 red flags. Review the reasons below.
What if you had copied this trader?
This trader's account size is not published, so the simulation cannot be calculated.
Sign up through our link and get up to 10% of your trading fees back on Binance — a share of our referral commission, returned to you.
This trader has red flags. A higher-graded trader may be a safer place to start.
Referral link — signing up through it supports CopyRadar at no extra cost to you.
New to copy trading?→ Read the getting-started guideMeasured vs exchange-reported
Our figures (from actual closed trades) next to what the exchange advertises. A wide gap is itself a warning sign.
| Metric | Measured | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Actual win rate | 53.3% | 52.4% |
| Closed trades (sample) | 75 trades | — |
| Profit concentration (top trade) | 18.1% | — |
| Profit factor | 1.44 | — |
| Median holding time | 6.7h | — |
| Max leverage | 20x | — |
| Avg leverage | 11x | — |
| Symbols traded | 28 symbols | — |
| Reported ROI | — | -100% |
| Reported MDD | — | 100.0% |
| Copier realized P&L | — | $0 |
| Current followers | — | 0 |
| Assets under mgmt (AUM) | — | $0 |
How the quality score is calculated
Starts from a base of 60 points, adds for healthy factors and deducts for risky ones. See the document for details. Methodology
Red flags found
The combined P&L of people who actually copied this trader is negative. The leader's result and the followers' result diverge sharply.
Assets fell more than 40% from their peak at some point — volatility that is psychologically hard to endure.
This analysis is reference information based on public data and is not investment advice. Trader ID: 4940450684142149121. See the investment disclaimer