热茶旧书
The exchange shows a headline ROI of 1960% (rank #23), but our analysis found 1 red flags. Review the reasons below.
What if you had copied this trader?
Enter your starting capital and a look-back period to see the simulated equity curve.
Simplified simulation. Assumes you mirror every trade at a size proportional to this trader's account (AUM) and that your position sizing stays fixed relative to your starting capital. Fees, funding, slippage, execution delay and copy limits are not included — real results will differ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sign up through our link and get up to 10% of your trading fees back on Binance — a share of our referral commission, returned to you.
This trader has red flags. A higher-graded trader may be a safer place to start.
Referral link — signing up through it supports CopyRadar at no extra cost to you.
New to copy trading?→ Read the getting-started guideMeasured vs exchange-reported
Our figures (from actual closed trades) next to what the exchange advertises. A wide gap is itself a warning sign.
| Metric | Measured | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Actual win rate | 80.0% | 70.6% |
| Closed trades (sample) | 10 trades | — |
| Profit concentration (top trade) | 33.2% | — |
| Profit factor | 27.27 | — |
| Median holding time | 8.4h | — |
| Max leverage | 20x | — |
| Avg leverage | 18x | — |
| Symbols traded | 7 symbols | — |
| Reported ROI | — | 1960% |
| Reported MDD | — | 39.4% |
| Copier realized P&L | — | $1.1K |
| Current followers | — | 65 |
| Assets under mgmt (AUM) | — | $18.0K |
How the quality score is calculated
Starts from a base of 60 points, adds for healthy factors and deducts for risky ones. See the document for details. Methodology
Red flags found
A statistically unreliable sample. Flashy returns may have come from a handful of lucky trades.
This analysis is reference information based on public data and is not investment advice. Trader ID: 5208806680932372992. See the investment disclaimer