Fluid-SegWit-Herb
The exchange shows a headline ROI of 17% (rank #81), but our analysis found 4 red flags. Review the reasons below.
What if you had copied this trader?
This trader's account size is not published, so the simulation cannot be calculated.
This trader has red flags. A higher-graded trader may be a safer place to start.
Referral link — signing up through it supports CopyRadar at no extra cost to you.
New to copy trading?→ Read the getting-started guideMeasured vs exchange-reported
Our figures (from actual closed trades) next to what the exchange advertises. A wide gap is itself a warning sign.
| Metric | Measured | Reported |
|---|---|---|
| Actual win rate | 100.0% | 57.8% |
| Closed trades (sample) | 2 trades | — |
| Profit concentration (top trade) | 61.5% | — |
| Profit factor | 242165151448.50 | — |
| Median holding time | 38.1d | — |
| Max leverage | 50x | — |
| Avg leverage | 35x | — |
| Symbols traded | 2 symbols | — |
| Reported ROI | — | 17% |
| Reported MDD | — | — |
| Copier realized P&L | — | — |
| Current followers | — | 0 |
| Assets under mgmt (AUM) | — | $0 |
How the quality score is calculated
Starts from a base of 60 points, adds for healthy factors and deducts for risky ones. See the document for details. Methodology
Red flags found
A statistically unreliable sample. Flashy returns may have come from a handful of lucky trades.
Operating at leverage that can be liquidated by a single swing. Copying amplifies loss risk.
Overall profit depends on a few home-run trades — closer to luck than skill, and hard to reproduce.
Concentrated in a few symbols with no diversification. Performance hinges on specific coin events.
This analysis is reference information based on public data and is not investment advice. Trader ID: AF2E90B3C25EE4C0. See the investment disclaimer